The Deception of Engagement: Comparing Musk and Bilzerian

The Deception of Engagement: Comparing Musk and Bilzerian

When I looked at the number of views compared to the likes, I found it extremely strange—so much so that I turned to AI to analyze the numbers and uncover the truth. The results were shocking. While Elon Musk’s large numbers may seem impressive at first glance, the hidden reality in the engagement rates paints a much darker picture of his methods and influence.

Engagement Data

1. Elon Musk

• Likes: 163,000

• Views: 30,000,000

• Engagement rate (likes/views):

2. Dan Bilzerian

• Likes: 10,000

• Views: 27,000

• Engagement rate (likes/views):

Analysis

Engagement Rate Comparison

• Musk’s Engagement Rate: 0.54%

Musk garnered a massive 163,000 likes, but compared to the overwhelming number of views—30 million views—less than 1% of those who saw the tweet interacted with it. This suggests that his tweets do not generate the kind of organic engagement that shows genuine support or interest from the audience. Instead, it appears there is an artificial push to amplify their reach.

• Bilzerian’s Engagement Rate: 37.04%

By contrast, Dan Bilzerian’s tweet was far more impactful. With only 27,000 views, it managed to secure 10,000 likes. This incredibly high engagement rate shows that his critical and provocative tone struck a nerve with his audience, unlike Musk’s approach, which relies solely on numerical dominance.

Reach vs. Impact: Musk as a Tool for Global Manipulation

While the difference in engagement between Musk and Bilzerian is clear, the real problem isn’t just in the numbers but in the intent. Musk, with his control over the platform, doesn’t just promote his opinions or stances—he uses Twitter as a tool to shape global public opinion, regardless of the truth or the negative impact it leaves behind.

The enormous view counts of his tweets, despite weak engagement, reveal how he uses his platform to force people to see his content, even if there is no genuine acceptance of it. In this context, his public support for Israel and his thanks to Benjamin Netanyahu can be understood as an attempt to reshape public perception in their favor, disregarding the reality of ongoing atrocities. The world is becoming increasingly aware of Israel’s racism and oppression, yet Musk seeks to reframe these truths through his platform’s sheer power.

This dynamic makes Musk a real danger—not just because of his racist views, but because he uses his influence to reshape global public opinion on some of the most critical issues, including crimes against humanity.

Conclusion: Musk as a Global Threat

Elon Musk is not just a businessman or a controversial figure. He is someone actively working to impose his control over ideas and opinions, using his platform as a weapon to force people to view—and perhaps adopt—his personal worldview. His support for war criminal Netanyahu and Israel, at a time when their crimes are becoming clearer, shows that he doesn’t stop at expressing his opinion but seeks to change the way the entire world thinks.

This is not just unethical behavior but a real threat. Musk is a man who must be confronted by all possible means, as he is not only trying to influence the internet but is attempting to manipulate the truth itself. He is a global danger that we must recognize and work to stop.